Better load-balancing and scalability

Post your MailEnable suggestions here.
Post Reply

Is MailEnable Enterprise "CLUSTER" option very scalable?

Yes
0
No votes
No
2
100%
Up to a point
0
No votes
 
Total votes: 2

AdamB
Posts: 11
Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2007 5:51 am
Location: Sydney, NSW

Better load-balancing and scalability

Post by AdamB »

In ME Enterprise I would love to be able to:

- Set drive\folder paths for EACH protocol queue
-- including different path for each inbound/outgoing folder/per protocol
-- This will allow us to spread the I/O load across different Disk controllers and HD's

- With Cluster, allow different folder shares for the ME Config and PO storage.
-- We have our PO storage on a SAN, yet the config folder needs this in the same folder for the cluster. Bummer.

- Allow Webmail to be installed on ANY IIS server, without needing ALL of ME being installed.
-- We want to use load balanced webserver farm, connecting to the SQL DB from each using a regkey or web.config file.
-- these would just be simple webserver machines and when load balanced we can setup stateful connections if session management is a pain for ME dev to have to worry about. (Unless you setup a common machine.config shared key to support stateless LB across IIS clusters)

:)
AB, North Sydney

fe
Posts: 22
Joined: Sun May 06, 2007 3:46 pm

Re: Better load-balancing and scalability

Post by fe »

You may wish to consider using Microsoft's "Junctions" (symbolic links) utility on the underlying file structure of operating system itself -- we've employed this methodology since 2006 with excellent results and no configuration or programming changes to the MailEnable Enterprise product were required.
System Administrator
Humphreys College

Post Reply